In this podcast, Tom Mullaney tells us about the DH Asia program at Stanford, including its origins as an idea and its potential future(s), format, and how it encourages anyone interested in or curious about DH to participate. After reflecting on the first round held in spring 2016, he briefly introduces the 2017 cohort (which officially kicked off after this podcast had already been recorded). We also discuss how existing digital infrastructures influence DH in East Asian studies and, briefly, how to maintain a healthy and productive skepticism in DH.
DH Asia 2017 schedule
Save the Chinese Typewriter project
In this episode, the usual hosts welcome Susan Fernsebner for a broader discussion about digital humanities and teaching. We reminisce about what has worked well in the classroom, what needs some tweaking, “experiments” using digital methods, and how teaching itself has changed from all of it. We also talk specifically about what DH can bring to East Asian history classes. We hope you enjoy the discussion as much as we did!
Links mentioned and other relevant links:
– Susan Fernsebner’s website and gulou tumblr.
– Taiping Civil War – Student site designed in Susan’s introductory History methods course.
– “Reworking the Methods Course” – Susan Fernsebner’s blog post on the Taiping Civil War course’s digital project as curriculum.
–“Mapping the Taiping Civil War” – blog post by Ryan Brazell about the site (Academic Technology Consultant, University of Richmond).
– Jeffrey McClurken’s Digital Liberal Arts Workshop Links & Resources and his website. McClurken is Professor of History and American Studies & Special Assistant to the Provost for Teaching, Technology, and Innovation at the University of Mary Washington — see his site for Digital Humanities Workshop Links (page listing tools, sample projects, articles and surveys related to curriculum development, collaboration, and more).
– University of Mary Washington’s Division of Teaching and Learning Technologies Blog – Great starting place for innovative conversations on digital pedagogy, online community, tools and resources, and more…
– Zach Whalen is a specialist in digital studies at UMW (research in video game history, platform studies, creative coding, and comics). Great work in teaching utilizing both visual and textual projects that intersect with the digital — e.g. twitterbots that utilize text and poetry in new ways, tumblr sites that explore visuality, bringing new insights gained through the digital lens (and slicing things in news ways with the help of code) to everything from House of Leaves (Mark Danielewski) to Top Gun.
– Digital literacy conversation: New Media Consortium’s Strategic Brief on Digital Literacy. See, for background: Bryan Alexander and a valuable critical perspective – “On digital literacies” by Maha Bali and Lee Skallerup-Bessette.
In this episode, we interview Javier Cha on how network visualization has helped him conceptualize his work on marriage networks in pre-modern Korean history. We also discuss more broadly network analysis and visualization tools, data sets as long-term historical sources, and digital humanities projects in South Korea.
Javier’s personal website and video presentation as part of Stanford’s DH Asia initiative
Network visualization and analysis tools mentioned in the episode: Cytoscape, GEPHI
The new Leiden University Centre for Digital Humanities, where Javier now works
“Digital / Humanities: New Media and Old Ways in South Korea” – Javier’s article in Asiascape: Digital Asia 2 (2015)
In this episode, we interview Hilde De Weerdt, Professor of Chinese History at Leiden University, about MARKUS, an online text markup tool developed as part of the European Research Council funded project “Communication and Empire: Chinese Empires in Comparative Perspective.”
– current beta version of MARKUS (note: only works in Google Chrome!)
– how to use MARKUS (includes videos with instructions)
– MARKUS conferences and workshops
– The Automating Data Extraction from Chinese Texts Project, which has funded further development of MARKUS.
– Hilde De Weerdt’s book website, which also includes interactive reading platforms and MARKUS files for some of her original research sources.
**Apologies for a few tiny audio glitches in this episode – we’re still working on perfecting our audio setup.**
In this podcast we discuss the article published in the Los Angeles Review of Books in May 2016 that criticized the Digital Humanities more broadly, some of the criticisms of it that followed, and relate this to some of our experiences in DH.
(anti-DH) LARB article – Neoliberal Tools (and Archives): A Political History of Digital Humanities (May 1, 2016)
LARB DH series – The Digital in the Humanities: An Interview with Bethany Nowviskie (May 9, 2016)
Some responses and criticisms that we read related to the anti-DH LARB article:
Grace Afsari-Mamagani – In Defense of DH
Jacquelyn Clements – In Support of Digital Humanities
Schuyler Esprit – tweets in Storify
Brian Greenspan – The Scandal of Digital Humanities
Alan Jacobs – Critiquing the Critique of Digital Humanities
Alan Liu – tweets in Storify
Alex Reid – De-baits in the Digital Humanities
Roopika Risam – Digital Humanities in Other Contexts
Amardeep Singh – In Defense of Digital Tools (by a Non-Tool)
Tuotilo (PhD student in Germany) – To Be in DH Is To Be Under Attack
Ted Underwood – Versions of Disciplinary History
Steward Varner – A few thoughts on the whole DH, neoliberalism, LARB thing
Welcome to the Digital Humanities in East Asian studies podcast. In this inaugural podcast we provide a short introduction to our rationale and the hosts. We then turn to Alan Christy for an introduction to The Gail Project.
The Gail Project on Twitter:
The podcast hosts on Twitter:
We welcome your feedback. You can leave us a message in the comments section below or contact us through social media.